[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#885166: instability with 4.14 regarding KVM virtualization



On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:02:48PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It's on a branch that started at 4.13-rc7 but wasn't merged into
> mainline until after 4.13.  Comparing the two of them, 569dbb88e80d has
> the addition of commit fb1522e099f0 "KVM: update to new mmu_notifier
> semantic v2".  So I would guess that what you landed on is a different
> bug than the one you were looking for.

Ouch. Two bugs with such similiar behavior in a single kernel release?

> Given that commit fb1522e099f0 was merged after -rc7 I assume it's an
> important fix, though the commit message doesn't spell that out.  So I
> think that whenever bisect asks you to test a version that doesn't
> contain it, you should cherry-pick it first to avoid the other bug.  (I
> think you will then need to use 'git bisect good|bad HEAD^' after
> testing, rather than implicitly flagging the current head commit.)

Would
  git show fb1522e099f0 | patch -p1
  build/test
  git reset --hard
  git bisect good|bad
be the same thing? I would feel much more comfortable with that.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany    |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421


Reply to: