[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [m68k]: Please pull m68k updates



On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 03:04 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Ben!
> 
> Please pull the master branch from [1] to add some missing drivers to
> ide-modules and scsi-modules on m68k. I have also enabled ata-modules
> for m68k which contains just libata. Apparently libata was already implicitly
> pulled in through pata-falcon through pata-modules. However, since other
> architectures list libata explicitly, I thought we should do that on m68k
> as well.
> 
> I have also created ide-core-modules and ide-modules for m68k explicitly
> and moved the old-style IDE drivers from pata-modules to ide-modules,
> where they actually belong. Re-enabling the ide-modules is supposed
> to be a temporary solution until the drivers in question have been
> converted to libata.

I've pulled these changes and pushed them out to master.

Just one question: would it not make sense to move ide-gd_mod to ide-
core-modules?  It seems odd to have cdrom-core-modules depend on ide-
modules.

Ben.

> Those drivers are buddha, gayle, macide and q40ide and I'm helping
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz from Samsung who is working on the porting
> efforts to libata.
> 
> I have build-tested my changes with the current src:linux package
> from experimental and verified my changes to work.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> > [1] https://github.com/glaubitz/linux-debian.git
> 
> 
-- 
Ben Hutchings
compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: