Re: armel/marvell kernel size
On 30 July 2017 19:05:18 BST, Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
>wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 23:12 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> linux 4.11-1~exp1 FTBFS on armel. I spent a little while
>modularising
>>> some things that were unnecessarily built-in, but the image size
>will
>>> still be very close to the current limit of 2 MiB. If it grows
>beyond
>>> this we'll lose support for many QNAP models.
>>
>> It's now (with 4.12.2-1~exp1) over 2 MiB; please look at this.
>
>While I'm still working on this, but I find the latest kernel in
>archive, 4.11.11-1+b1, fails to boot on my kirkwood based Linkstation.
>I tried netconsole, but don't get any log. (netconsole outputs fine on
>working kernels, such as 4.9 and 4.10 series.)
>And I trace to latest working kernel is 4.10.7-1~exp1.
>
>4.11-1_exp[12] FTBFS on armel, and 4.11.3-1_exp1 doesn't boot.
>
>I checked d-kernel and d-arm list, but didn't find similar issue.
>Do you have any clue on this? Thanks!
I found that with 4.11 the initrd was too big for my ts41x. Could it be that?
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: