[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support



Hello,

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/templates/control.source.in b/debian/templates/control.source.in
> index 08969a3da9d9..2a1fdf048823 100644
> --- a/debian/templates/control.source.in
> +++ b/debian/templates/control.source.in
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.8
>   libperl-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
>   libunwind8-dev [amd64 armel armhf arm64 i386] <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
>   python-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
> + libbabeltrace-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
> + libbabeltrace-ctf-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,

Out of curiosity,

The final patch that got merged has versioned depends on babeltrace >=1.5.0, but
Jessie has 1.2.3. While trying to do a linux kernel backport, I have come up
with a question if we really need babeltrace >=1.5.0 or if 1.2.3 has the needed
features. Do you happen to know?

Note: In anycase, I am preparing a backport of babeltrace.

Regards

>  # used by upstream to build usbip
>   autoconf <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools>,
>   automake <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools>,
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 


-- 
  Hector Oron

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: