On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 16:16 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 12/07/2016 03:14 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The firmware-nonfree package is non-free because: > > - No real source code is provided for the firmware > > - Some licences do not permit creation of derivatives, or reverse- > > engineering > > - Some licences only permit use with a particular manufacturer's > > products > > - Some licences require presentation of a click-wrap licence when > > the firmware is distributed to end-users (see > > debian/config/ivtv/LICENSE and debian/config/ipw2x00/LICENSE) > > > > None of the licences appear to preclude auto-building. > > Thanks, I have whitelisted the package. > > > I'm assuming that there is an arch:all builder for non-free > > packages; > > if not then we'll just have to remember not to do 'source' uploads > > of > > this package. > > My understanding is that this should work. If it doesn't, please > communicate that back. Thanks! It worked, thanks. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an expert.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part