[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#572406: marked as done ("users" Mount Option Broken)



Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:19:23 -0800
with message-id <20161216001923.GA40949@scollay.m5p.com>
and subject line #572406 got fixed at some point (likely same time as #501459)
has caused the Debian Bug report #572406,
regarding "users" Mount Option Broken
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
572406: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572406
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.1.2-6lenny1

The "users" option got broken with the latest release, despite working
correctly in 1:1.0.10-6+etch.1 (old stable). Non-root users can mount
filesystems listed in /etc/fstab that have "users" specified, but they
will be unable to unmount the filesystem
("umount.nfs: You are not permitted to unmount ...").

My first thought is someone confused the "user" (which would need to
check who mounted the FS) and "users" option. Given bug report #501459,
part of which sounds like a similar issue with cifs, I'm also wondering
if the interface between `mount` and `mount.<fstype>` got changed
slightly.


-- 
(\___(\___(\______          --=> 8-) EHM <=--          ______/)___/)___/)
 \BS (    |         EHeM@gremlin.m5p.com PGP F6B23DE0         |    )   /
  \_CS\   |  _____  -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O-   _____  |   /  _/
2477\___\_|_/DC21 03A0 5D61 985B <-PGP-> F2BE 6526 ABD2 F6B2\_|_/___/3DE0





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 572406 1:1.2.8-9
quit

My guess is the change in sys-utils which fixed #501459 likely also fixed
#572406, otherwise it got fixed at $somepoint.


-- 
(\___(\___(\______          --=> 8-) EHM <=--          ______/)___/)___/)
 \BS (    |         EHeM+sigmsg@m5p.com  PGP 87145445         |    )   /
  \_CS\   |  _____  -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O-   _____  |   /  _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445

--- End Message ---

Reply to: