[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.



Sven Geggus <lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de> writes:

> Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 11:01 Uhr:
>
>> Would you consider uploading it or proposing it in mentors.debian.net?
>> Please also send details on the gss-proxy ITP bug.
>
> Robbie is the one with the ITP bug, not me :)
>
> I just pushed my custom package data to github though:
> https://github.com/giggls/gssproxy

Hi, glad the github fork was useful.

I have the bulk of my package done for the ITP, but haven't gotten
init-related functionality working yet.

Upstream (that's Simo and me, though this is Simo's decision) prefer the
name "GSS-Proxy" for anything written in a sentence, and "gssproxy" for
everything else.  The package in Fedora and RHEL/CentOS is called
"gssproxy", for instance.

As for the NFS pieces: upstream, we package example configuration files
for an NFS server, apache (mod_auth_gssapi), and an NFS client.  We
don't provide any additional scripting for NFS; NFS takes care of that.

Hope that helps,
--Robbie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: