[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#632422: marked as done ([INTL:ko] Korean debconf template translation for linux-base)



Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2016 01:15:59 +0100
with message-id <1474071359.2621.92.camel@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#632422: [INTL:ko] Korean debconf template translation for linux-base
has caused the Debian Bug report #632422,
regarding [INTL:ko] Korean debconf template translation for linux-base
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
632422: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Package: linux-base
Version: 3.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch

It is attached to this report.

Attachment: linux-base.po
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 04:24:07 +0100 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 15:30 +0900, 김종규 wrote:
> > Package: linux-base
> > Version: 3.2
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: l10n patch
> > 
> > It is attached to this report.
> 
> Please fill in the title, copyright information and author at the top of
> the file.

I never got a reply to this, and the debconf templates that existed in
2011 have all been removed.

I would welcome a translation of the new templates, with correct metadata.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Kids!  Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous.  Do not attempt it
in
your own home. - Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, `Good Omens'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply to: