On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 16:26 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > Processing raised an exception: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 968, in check > final_suites = self._final_suites() > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 857, in _final_suites > if self._check_new(suite, overridesuite): > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 822, in _check_new > if self._check_new_binary_overrides(suite, overridesuite): > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 786, in _check_new_binary_overrides > packages = source.package_list.packages_for_suite(suite) > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 128, in packages_for_suite > built = entry.built_in_suite(suite) > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 58, in built_in_suite > built_on_arch = self.built_on_architecture(arch.arch_string) > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 49, in built_on_architecture > if match_architecture(architecture, arch): > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/architecture.py", line 94, in match_architecture > raise InvalidArchitecture('{0} is not a valid architecture name or wildcard'.format(wildcard)) > InvalidArchitecture: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard OK, what's the story here? This had better get fixed quickly, otherwise I'm going to have to revert the package changes. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part