Control: tag -1 pending On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 20:46 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 20:16 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: [...] > > > I know that n32 is quite same as x32, while I cannot understand why > > > both of them have to be 'in a multiarch configuration', > > > and cannot be a standalone architecture? > > Because they really are in a multiarch configuration. They rely on a > > 64-bit kernel. Labelling it as belonging to the same architecture as > > 32-bit userland is a hack, which we no longer need to use. > If you think standalone n32/x32 port is not useful at all, > can you help to modified the 4 N32 port to the same way with x32? That's what I've committed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part