[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#824524: please support building linux-libc-dev for the tilegx architecture



Source: linux
Version: 4.5.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: helmutg@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap

Hi Ben et al,

could you carry the attached patch adding minimla support for the tilegx
architecture to the linux source package? The architecture is pending
inclusion into dpkg (#823167), but thus far the prospective port looks
good as it is upstreamed in many places (binutils/gcc/glibc/linux/...)
already.

After applying the patch debian/control needs to be regenerated. If you
prefer having dpkg add the architecture before linux, we can block the
bug.

For a fully working linux-libc-dev:tilegx, I'd also need #823632 fixed.

Helmut
diff --minimal -Nru linux-4.5.3/debian/changelog linux-4.5.3/debian/changelog
--- linux-4.5.3/debian/changelog	2016-05-08 16:03:45.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-4.5.3/debian/changelog	2016-05-17 06:21:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+linux (4.5.3-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Enable building linux-libc-dev for tilegx. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>  Tue, 17 May 2016 06:20:55 +0200
+
 linux (4.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * [s390x] PCI: Ignore zpci ABI changes; these functions are not used by
diff --minimal -Nru linux-4.5.3/debian/config/defines linux-4.5.3/debian/config/defines
--- linux-4.5.3/debian/config/defines	2016-05-08 12:56:03.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-4.5.3/debian/config/defines	2016-05-17 06:22:27.000000000 +0200
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
  sh4
  sparc
  sparc64
+ tilegx
  x32
 compiler: gcc-5
 featuresets:
diff --minimal -Nru linux-4.5.3/debian/config/tilegx/defines linux-4.5.3/debian/config/tilegx/defines
--- linux-4.5.3/debian/config/tilegx/defines	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-4.5.3/debian/config/tilegx/defines	2016-05-17 06:22:08.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+[base]
+kernel-arch: tile
+featuresets:
+# empty; just building headers yet

Reply to: