Bug#762634: initramfs-tools: [armhf] mounting rootfs on USB disk fails / some USB host controller drivers missing in initramfs
- To: 762634@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#762634: initramfs-tools: [armhf] mounting rootfs on USB disk fails / some USB host controller drivers missing in initramfs
- From: Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:49:21 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] C5D696B1-332A-473F-8E37-547D8D67DD0F@pobox.com>
- Reply-to: Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>, 762634@bugs.debian.org
- References: <20140923212232.GA5236@excalibur.cnev.de> <2014-09-23T23-41-33@devnull.michael-prokop.at> <20140925061548.GA9422@excalibur.cnev.de> <2014-09-25T09-19-47@devnull.michael-prokop.at> <20140925103222.GG2653@mraw.org> <2014-09-25T13-29-00@devnull.michael-prokop.at> <20140925200457.GA5873@excalibur.cnev.de> <20140925203849.GO2653@mraw.org> <20140925211309.GC5873@excalibur.cnev.de> <54249535.5010008@p10link.net> <1411686515.3659.39.camel@decadent.org.uk> <1412061597.17796.27.camel@hellion.org.uk> <1412076848.9388.94.camel@decadent.org.uk> <87pozgdoxt.fsf@aikidev.net> <1447321773.18450.43.camel@hellion.org.uk> <1453735014.3734.222.camel@decadent.org.uk> <87twlpjr61.fsf@aikidev.net> <1454601006.3989.38.camel@decadent.org.uk> <87lh69eo1q.fsf@aikidev.net> <87fuwhemj0.fsf@aikidev.net>
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:06:27 -0800 Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> wrote:
> On 2016-02-24, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2016-02-04, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> Oh, so the MODULES=most case is bust and we need to list more host
> >> controller drivers (or include all modules under drivers/usb/host/).
> >> How about MODULES=dep; does that work now?
> >
> > MODULES=dep appears to pull in the necessary drivers on a recent stretch
> > install on a wandboard solo, using initramfs-tools 0.123, but
> > MODULES=most still requires manually including them in
> > /etc/initramfs-tools/modules.
>
> And, FWIW, MODULES=dep appears to also workaround the issue on the wandboard dual
> with initramfs-tools 0.120.
>
>
> live well,
> vagrant
would it make sense to ensure that MODULES=most is always a superset of MODULES=dep? Could this be done by running MODULES=dep first, then running MODULES=most and delivering the union of the two sets?
Thanks!
Rick
Reply to: