On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 14:41 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote: > Ben - > > Thanks for queueing these. I've been trying to figure out the process from > this point forward, though, and wondering if you can help educate me. > Looking at > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/linux/?C=M;O=A, it > looks like there has been at least (4.3.5-1) unstable and (4.4.1-1~exp1) > experimental builds since the patches were queued, but I don't think I saw > the aufs patches in those changelogs. I also haven't yet seen any builds > beyond those, and those are both lower urgency, it looks like. Those versions of the kernel package do not include aufs at all. (They do have a few supporting changes that allow aufs to be built separately as a module.) > If these were queued for a security update, is there a deadline timer > before they go out for jessie-security and wheezy-backports, or does it > just mean they're on a security train that goes out with the next CVE? The latter. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part