Hi Ben, thanks for the quick answer. On Sunday 31 January 2016 23:37:56 Ben Hutchings wrote: > That suggests a regression in the padlock-aes driver, although I don't > see any functional changes there. As a workaround, you can blacklist > it by adding "blacklist=padlock-aes" to the kernel command line. of course, but this machine is mainly serving files and running backups and padlock really makes a difference in throughput. > I wonder whether the compiler version makes a difference. Does the > 3.16 kernel in the wheezy-backports suite behave any differently? Unfortunatly, that wasn't it. The bp.o kernel shows the same symptoms. Anything else I can try out or do to provide more info? Cheers Carsten
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.