On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 22:52 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Le 24/09/2016 à 09:05, nutzteil a écrit : > > > > Package: linux-image-amd64 > > Version: 4.6+74~bpo8+1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hello, > > current meta-Package linux-image-$ARCH jessie-backports depends on > > linux-image 4.6, > > which is no longer available in jessie-backports. > > > > Same incident for meta-Package linux-headers-$ARCH > > It seems the problem comes from the migration to signed > kernel/modules in testing/unstable. The backport of the linux package > do not revert this part, so only linux-image-*-unsigned packages are > present in backport. And linux-signed has not been backported. > > Ben: what it the correct path? Should linux-signed be backported? [...] It has; it's waiting in NEW. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Who are all these weirdos? - David Bowie, reading IRC for the first time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part