On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 16:26 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
> Processing raised an exception: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 968, in check
> final_suites = self._final_suites()
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 857, in _final_suites
> if self._check_new(suite, overridesuite):
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 822, in _check_new
> if self._check_new_binary_overrides(suite, overridesuite):
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 786, in _check_new_binary_overrides
> packages = source.package_list.packages_for_suite(suite)
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 128, in packages_for_suite
> built = entry.built_in_suite(suite)
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 58, in built_in_suite
> built_on_arch = self.built_on_architecture(arch.arch_string)
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 49, in built_on_architecture
> if match_architecture(architecture, arch):
> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/architecture.py", line 94, in match_architecture
> raise InvalidArchitecture('{0} is not a valid architecture name or wildcard'.format(wildcard))
> InvalidArchitecture: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard
OK, what's the story here? This had better get fixed quickly,
otherwise I'm going to have to revert the package changes.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part