On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 12:47 +0100, Christophe wrote:
> ----- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> a écrit :
> >
> > On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 13:04 +0100, Christophe wrote:
> > > Package: initramfs-tools
> > > Version: 0.123
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Let me know if there is some info you'd need to debug the issue.
> >
> > I wonder if busybox got upgraded too late. Is this reproducible if you
> > run 'update-initramfs -u' now?
> >
> > Ben.
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Unfortunately running this command still gives me the error.
> Out of curiosity I have started some investigations, and the message comes from the script "mkinitramfs" from this check:
>
> if [ "${BUSYBOX}" = "y" ] && [ -z "${BUSYBOXDIR}" ]; then
>
> I have seen this:
> - BUSYBOX is properly set to "y" from /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
> - BUSYBOXDIR, however, is prepared empty at the beginning of mkinitramfs, but never given a value afterwards... Any idea how it is supposed to be defined?
It's done by /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d/busybox, which is
installed by busybox. Does that file exist?
You originally said:
> This is strange because I seem to have this:
> busybox => 1:1.22.0-18
> busybox-static => 1:1.22.0-18
That's impossible because these packages conflict with each other.
What does "debsums busybox busybox-static" report? (You might need to
install the debsums package.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power. France is bacon.Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part