On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 16:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
[...]
> I think the current default is fine. Someone who compiles kdbus.ko
> probably does that for a reason. The only reason, why we might consider
> switching the default to off, is that the Debian kernel suddenly starts
> building kdbus.ko and we don't feel comfortable yet, running kdbus by
> default for everyone. So far, kdbus has not yet been merged upstream and
> I don't know of any plans that the Debian kernel team considers shipping
> a distro-specific patch which adds kdbus support.
>
> But let's bring them into the loop here:
> @Debian kernel maintainers: Please give us (pkg-systemd) a heads up,
> whenever you consider enabling kdbus in the Debian kernel.
This won't happen unless and until it's accepted upstream.
Also, you will need to ensure that udev does not depend on kdbus until
kdbus initialisation is done in the initramfs.
(I have to say, kdbus is looking less and less like a good idea... and
I'm not at all impressed at systemd upstream trying to go around the
review process. Oh well.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Hoare's Law of Large Problems:
Inside every large problem is a small problem struggling to get out.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part