On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote: > On 07/07/2015 02:51 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > That's a bug/limitation of ethtool, not the driver. > So, does this bug get moved to ethtool, or back to l-m-t? There's > certainly nothing in ethtool's manpage that suggests this should be > necessary, but working around it in l-m-t is easy. [...] I think there are multiple bugs here, since Ritesh said that a particular driver was failing to change mode when both speed and duplex were specified. Fixing the issue in ethtool is not quite as trivial as it might seem, s o l-m-t should be changed to work around that for now. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If the facts do not conform to your theory, they must be disposed of.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part