Am 25.04.2015 um 14:44 schrieb Michael Biebl: > I just tried to boot a system where the initramfs had been built with > BUSYBOX=n. This failed miserably and ended in a kernel panic. > > /init: exec: line 330: switch_root: not found > [attempted to kill init ...] > > > Looks to me, as if BUSYBOX=n mode is pretty much broken. It should > either be fixed or not allowed at all. > > I created an initramfs with BUSYBOX=n and BUSYBOX=y and diffed the > lsinitramfs output. The following binaries are missing in BUSYBOX=n [..] I'm inclined to bump the severity of this bug to RC unless someone disagrees. If we offer the BUSYBOX=n mode, it shouldn't produce an unbootable initramfs. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature