Bug#777455: linux 3.16.7-ckt4-3: [PATCH] Please add dts for A20-OLinuXino-LIME2
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 07:57 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 06:20:50AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-02-08 at 12:25 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > > Attached is a patch against
> > > the Debian kernel SVN to backport the devicetree from kernel
> > > 3.18.
> >
> > Applied to SVN for -4, thanks. BTW, your patch seemed to have DOS line
> > endings, I ran dos2unix.
>
> Hello,
>
> the line endings issue is strange - I have just checked the email
> in my "outgoing" folder and the BTS entry - in both the patch has
> normal unix-style line endings (LF):
Strange, the version I saved from evolution is:
00000000 49 6e 64 65 78 3a 20 64 65 62 69 61 6e 2f 70 61 |Index: debian/pa|
00000010 74 63 68 65 73 2f 66 65 61 74 75 72 65 73 2f 61 |tches/features/a|
00000020 72 6d 2f 64 74 73 2d 73 75 6e 37 69 2d 41 64 64 |rm/dts-sun7i-Add|
00000030 2d 73 75 70 70 6f 72 74 2d 66 6f 72 2d 41 32 30 |-support-for-A20|
00000040 2d 4f 4c 69 6e 75 58 69 6e 6f 2d 4c 69 6d 65 32 |-OLinuXino-Lime2|
00000050 2e 70 61 74 63 68 0d 0a 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d |.patch..========|
^ ^
00000060 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d |================|
$ md5sum /tmp/A20-OLinuXino-LIME2.patch
5d559632f0195357d27a3dfd64eed328 /tmp/A20-OLinuXino-LIME2.patch
But via mutt:
00000000 49 6e 64 65 78 3a 20 64 65 62 69 61 6e 2f 70 61 |Index: debian/pa|
00000010 74 63 68 65 73 2f 66 65 61 74 75 72 65 73 2f 61 |tches/features/a|
00000020 72 6d 2f 64 74 73 2d 73 75 6e 37 69 2d 41 64 64 |rm/dts-sun7i-Add|
00000030 2d 73 75 70 70 6f 72 74 2d 66 6f 72 2d 41 32 30 |-support-for-A20|
00000040 2d 4f 4c 69 6e 75 58 69 6e 6f 2d 4c 69 6d 65 32 |-OLinuXino-Lime2|
00000050 2e 70 61 74 63 68 0a 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d |.patch.=========|
^
$ md5sum /tmp/A20-OLinuXino-LIME2.patch.1
296f9b6c9d26e96177bb3a7ed956f8d8 /tmp/A20-OLinuXino-LIME2.patch.1
So it looks like it is evolution on my end which has done it -- I've no
idea why it would do that! Not something I've noticed before I don't
think...
Ian.
Reply to: