Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)

To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Cc: 809204@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)
From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:20:05 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87mvsuzp4q.fsf@jidanni.org>
Reply-to: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>, 809204@bugs.debian.org
References: <1451305449.25978.29.camel@decadent.org.uk>

OK I find BUSYBOX=y.
But I don't think I ever tampered with that file.
That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with problems shortly...

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)
Next by Date: Processing of firmware-nonfree_20151207-1~bpo8+1_i386.changes
Previous by thread: Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)
Next by thread: Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread