On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 07:46 -0500, Robert Henney wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:20:49AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 19:20 -0500, Robert Henney wrote: > > > Package: src:linux > > > Version: 3.2.73-2+deb7u1 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > Today's kernel security update appears to have broken JFS support on i386, though JFS > > > still appears to be working on x86_64. > > [...] > > > > I don't think so. Have you rebooted the i386 system yet? > > > > Ben. > > When I said i386 earlier, I probably mean 686. > > I rebooted following each of the re-installs of the linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae package, > switching between versions 3.2.68-1+deb7u3 and 3.2.73-2+deb7u1 of it. Changing nothing > else, the jfs module loads and jfs partitions mount at boot with the earlier package > version, and with the latest package the jfs module fails to load and dmesg contains > those errors I mentioned. Reproducable every time here, as I've switched the package > between versions several times (rebooting after each) to confirm. Which boot loader are you using? Your report doesn't list any: Versions of packages linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae suggests: pn debian-kernel-handbook <none> pn grub-pc | extlinux | lilo <none> ii linux-doc-3.2 3.2.73-2+deb7u1 Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your own home. - Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, `Good Omens'
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part