On Sat, 2015-06-20 at 23:42 +0200, MiloMak wrote:
[...]
> i am wondering whether the difference lies in the missing btcx_risc?
>
> $ cat /boot/config-4.0.0 | grep BTCX
> j$ cat /boot/config-3.17-4.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64 | grep BTCX
> CONFIG_VIDEO_BTCX=m
>
> i don't have much knowledge in the ways of the kernel so your guidance
> would eb appreciated.
I don't think it has anything to do with that. Here's the explanation
of that change:
commit 90ca8bef9082c2036a200dd2cd17924944cd339b
Author: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Date: Fri Dec 12 10:27:56 2014 -0300
[media] btcx-risc: move to bt8xx
The btcx-risc module is no longer used by other drivers except for bttv.
So move it from common to bt8xx and make it part of the bttv driver instead
of as a separate module.
This module should never have been a common module since most of the code
has always been bttv specific.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part