Hi everyone, wheezy-backports has 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1~bpo70+1 built, while the source info already refers to linux_3.16.7-ckt11.orig.tar.xz (see [0]). Since ckt11 has CVE-2015-3636 fixed and ckt9 has not (see [1]), I was wondering whether or not there is some issue with building ckt11 for wheezy-backports. If there is no such issue, I would be very happy to see ckt11 get into wheezy-backports, since apart from the security issue mentioned above, ckt11 also has the proper backlisting for the queued TRIM command in the broken Samsung 850 Pro SSD firmware. Kind regards, Christian [0] https://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3636 -- kernel concepts GmbH Tel: +49-271-771091-11 Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 D-57072 Siegen http://www.kernelconcepts.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.