Hello,
Thanks for reply.
>why do you create a full new copy of a config, this is certainly not needed.
An
option in standard config file must be disable to pass compilation. I
am not very familiar with how these options are used. This is the way I
found. It's a little ugly indeed. I will try another way.
>dude break up this patch in logic parts. this an unreadable mess.
Sorry for that, I gather everything in one patch make this patch a little big. Should I send them in different parts?
>I don't get why a clang patch should patch a fs!?
You mean patch files in fs? This is for removing valais that clang doesn't support.
Many thanks for your time.