On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:13:35AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 21:45 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > * cgroups improvements, see 9edad6ea0f1416415f6fe31cc9d1dbc3817803ed > > and friends. Is our patch set disabling it still needed, hence? > > I don't know. I was meaning to run a benchmark to see what the cost of > enabling memory cgroups (but not creating any) is now. The benchmark > should probably be something that allocates large amounts of memory, > forks and exec's. One of the AIM benchmarks > <http://aimbench.sourceforge.net/> might be suitable. Could you try > that? never run that beast yet, but can try sometime in the next weeks. > I think these are all still needed, so I've rebased and re-enabled them. thank you for the forward porting! (: so unless something fundamental comes up, I'd plan to upload tomorrow evening a first 3.19 to exp. -- maks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature