On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 20:22 +0100, Robert de Bath wrote:On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:But that's rather different to now enabling x32 in the arch=amd64 kernel which is what #708070 is about. Likewise creating a new flavour=x86,arch=amd64 kernel. What the people responsible for the x32 arch on debian-ports do wrt an arch=x32 flavour is up to them, but that's the situation analogous to what you are referring to. Ian.
I was referring to the package that's now called linux-image-3.14-1-amd64:i386 not linux-image-3.14-1-amd64:amd64 The equivalents would be approximatly linux-image-3.14-1-x32:amd64 and linux-image-3.14-1-x32:i386 not any packages in the new port. Frankly when Ben said "... those where the administrator actually wants tosupport x32." I took that to be him hinting that there would be such a package "shortly" so the administrator could make the choice easily.
As that doesn't seem to be the case I decided to speak up; but now I'm wondering where you're going with this?
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to 708070-unsubscribe@bugs.debian.org.
-- Rob. (Robert de Bath <robert$ @ debath.co.uk>) <http://www.debath.co.uk/>