Bug#745349: Basic arm64 kernel
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 12:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 11:27 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 23:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > You shouldn't need to specify the config files at all.
> > > [...]
> > > This looks just the same as for armel and armhf... except using Image
> > > instead of zImage. Let me see what I can do to clean up these per-arch
> > > rules so this duplication isn't needed.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Rebased version attached.
>
> Looks good to me.
Thanks. I'm not going to push it now since the build-deps cannot be
satisfied yet and arm64 is using the existing minimal support for
linux-libc-dev, so I don't want to break that. (TBH not sure how that
works now, perhaps some build profile stuff I'm not seeing/don't
understand).
Ian.
Reply to: