Bug#735172: replacing current invalid kirkwood kernel?

To: 735172@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#735172: replacing current invalid kirkwood kernel?
From: Hardy Griech <ntbox@mardys.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:25:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 52D99FB2.6000205@mardys.de>
Reply-to: Hardy Griech <ntbox@mardys.de>, 735172@bugs.debian.org

I'm worrying that others owning a TS-11x who do "apt update && aptupgrade" are bricking their devices. Resulting in loss of credibilityof Debian in worst case.

Is it possible to do a binary-only upload of the kernel with a fake one?Meaning instead of the 3.12.6-2 kirkwood-kernel the old 3.11.10-1kernel could be used. This has to be documented of course.


Hardy

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#735172: replacing current invalid kirkwood kernel?
  - From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#733565: Bug#707178: Breakin - stress-test and hardware diagnostics tool - Please see if you are able to assist to an issue we are having now for more than a month on 3 servers
Next by Date: Bug#735172: replacing current invalid kirkwood kernel?
Previous by thread: Bug#733565: Bug#707178: Breakin - stress-test and hardware diagnostics tool - Please see if you are able to assist to an issue we are having now for more than a month on 3 servers
Next by thread: Bug#735172: replacing current invalid kirkwood kernel?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread