On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 13:44 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:00:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:15:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > I have reverted to 0.116 which works just fine. I am perfectly OK with > > > staying with this version but maybe the newer version should depend on > > > systemd so the reason for this requirement is clear. > > > > you mix udev and systemd, so no it doesn't need full systemd. It needs > > the devices to show up. And yes udev is part nowadays of systemd. > > Yeah, I meant udev but then ended up writing systemd instead. We do depend on udev. > > Also you may want to just fix your config setup. (; But we should document that this is necessary. Maybe also try to find out why that is, as it's not obvious to me. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part