On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 12:22 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > No "Hi" at the begin as it seems to be not common sense anymore to > greet before answering. > > Am Do den 2. Jan 2014 um 13:46 schrieb Roger Leigh: > > > This will prevent from using /usr via NFS or having a /usr md device or > > > having /usr on LVM (Not sure about any of this issues, as I use initram > > > only on systems with a NFS /usr.) And there is even more cases where the > > > /usr mount needs to be done later in init stack. > > > > This patchset will continue to allow you to have /usr on NFS and/or > > MD/LVM. However, it will require you to use an initramfs to mount > > /usr as a separate filesystem. > > And that will break all systems that are well designed by having a > separate /usr That's not so much a design as a tradition arising from historical constraints: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2010-December/074114.html>. > and have, for any well decided reason, no initram. And > there are several reasons why you would not want to have it. > > And, in my case, that would break most of my systems as I usually avoid > to use a initram. [...] Sorry, but you'll probably have to change them eventually. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part