[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] Add ppc64el support to src:linux



On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 09:06 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> This patch-set adds support to the ppc64el port in the linux source package. 
> It includes fixes and improvements to the previous 'PATCH' submission [0].
> 
> Thank you for the comments, discussions, and patience kindly had so far. :)
> 
> As always, any feedback is welcome.
[...]
> Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (9):
>   ppc64el: kernel: defines file
>   ppc64el: kernel: config: little-endian powerpc64 options
>   ppc64el: kernel: config: split common/big-endian powerpc64 options
>   ppc64el: kernel: config: enable HTM as common powerpc64 option
>   ppc64el: kernel: patch: temporarily disable zImage
>   ppc64el: kernel: patch: one patch for the PowerNV platform
>   ppc64el: installer: new files
>   ppc64el: bug: bug/include-model
>   patches

I only got 8 following patches, but it looks the 9th was an accidental
commit containing copies of the preceding 8 patches:

[...]
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0000-cover-letter.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0001-ppc64el-kernel-defines-file.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0002-ppc64el-kernel-config-little-endian-powerpc64-option.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0003-ppc64el-kernel-config-split-common-big-endian-powerp.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0004-ppc64el-kernel-config-enable-HTM-as-common-powerpc64.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0005-ppc64el-kernel-patch-temporarily-disable-zImage.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0006-ppc64el-kernel-patch-one-patch-for-the-PowerNV-platf.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0007-ppc64el-installer-new-files.patch
>  create mode 100644 submit-patches/0008-ppc64el-bug-bug-include-model.patch

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: