Control: retitle -1 Bad page state triggered by chromium on PAE kernel On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 22:11 -0400, [[User:Unforgettableid]] wrote: [...] > But your replies made me realize that perhaps I was wrong. I did > upgrade from a non-PAE kernel (on Squeeze) to a PAE kernel (on > Wheezy), so in truth, the bugs could be caused by anything. Can you send a copy of /proc/cpuinfo from this machine? [...] > The 3.2 kernel has been giving me at least a couple bad-pagetable > errors per hour. But despite this, I haven't found a reliable way to > trigger a bad-pagetable error. > > Should I file a new bug with a better subject line, and after I do so, > you can close this bug as "invalid"? No, we can just retitle this. > Alternatively, should this bug be closed as "invalid" and no > replacement be filed? I can keep on using my Squeeze kernel for the > next few years: it works fine on Wheezy, and my machine is merely a > home laptop. If you do that, you won't get any kernel security updates after May 2014 (or at all if you already removed squeeze security from your APT sources). Using linux-image-486 would be a better workaround (assuming this machine has a single-core processor). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part