Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
- To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, "jonsmirl@gmail.com" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>, devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, "luke.leighton" <luke.leighton@gmail.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, debian-arm <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>, Linux on small ARM machines <arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk>, ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, debian-kernel <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
- From: "luke.leighton" <luke.leighton@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 22:13:59 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAPweEDxG4ZpidvhTEN+pEgBSFMzpkQj-iY3x0vbgj7ib7pTz8A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAPweEDw3_M_5e_B2HueCNcfXjO9_4_oiCJuEfTERetyoOx=+vw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] CAPweEDz=hFxXW3XF9CSNZpEFSjayb5an1E8Xze1_uQcCZONVxg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1370469574.18839.33.camel@localhost> <[🔎] CAPweEDxMpeJc-w=Yd7d2OT=UisRBp2rxf-MPMDUCOG3EyJz1GQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAKON4OxwyV2f_iTEb5RnP_azc7EsSxPdku_TY5WLWxN7USiY1Q@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAPweEDw1BabE0cmT5fxZ3Z9p9EH508M3Nzcqk2VcO0oz-qYsvg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost> <[🔎] CAPweEDwS3tR=wh-bZJb3vqR8fVQra=3XxDitowGRdH9c7WRfmQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAKON4OxPDpN3BTc9GWP44exDSkAZGJ5OeCpUP37vRnnvxwUnmw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAOesGMgqxhG45NyCfpHc_0uHS+_Gn-hGZm-+CRvK2EEf1AGTow@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20130606172810.GE14209@lukather> <[🔎] 20130607185724.GZ14125@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk> <[🔎] CAPweEDw3_M_5e_B2HueCNcfXjO9_4_oiCJuEfTERetyoOx=+vw@mail.gmail.com>
right - too many people contributed to this, input from jon smirl,
wookie, maxime, tomasz, henrik, i've made a start here and will
continue editing: this is notes for me to put forward an agenda for
discussion:
http://hands.com/~lkcl/allwinner_linux_proposal.txt
i'm setting a rule that each section *has* to have a list of clear
benefits, otherwise it'll have to be removed before it goes on to
their Directors.
so - even if there are any allwinner engineers reading this who would
like something put forward please also speak up! :)
l.
Reply to: