On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 22:41 +0200, Joachim Selinger wrote: > Hi Ben, hi Michael! > > On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 16:31:18 +0100 > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > BH> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 12:08 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > BH> > * Joachim Selinger [Fri May 31, 2013 at 10:25:17PM +0200]: > BH> > > BH> > [...] > BH> > > run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-4-amd64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-amd64 > BH> > > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-4-amd64 > BH> > > E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/pcidetect failed with return 1. > BH> > [...] > BH> > > BH> > Well, I'm not aware of a file > BH> > /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/pcidetect shipped by Debian. > BH> > > BH> > What does 'dpkg -S /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/pcidetect' return? > BH> > BH> Well, this has nothing to do with the original bug report, so Joachim > BH> should open a new bug report against whatever package it is. > > Thanks for this and sorry for the trouble. You are absolutely right. This file > does not belong to any package anymore - seems to be a leftover from > long ago. I just removed it and everything is ok. > > Again, sorry for reporting this. > > Is it ok to just ignore this now or do I have to do anything to close > my report? As I said, you didn't open your own bug report. Bug #636697 relates to a very different problem and should not be closed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part