* Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:20:04PM +0100]: > On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 22:17 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > * Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100]: > > > What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0 > > > then it'll need to be soon. :-| > > We've 0.109.1 which fixes that in wheezy and unstable, shouldn't > > this be enough? Is experimental's 0.110 of i-t an issue WRT to r0? > > I'd push a 0.111 release to experimental immediately then. > Bah, I misread the versions and thought it was affecting the recent > upload to sid; sorry for the noise. No worries, I've just released and uploaded i-t v0.111 which includes the fixes which went into wheezy (thanks for that, Ben) to avoid further confusion. regards, -mika-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature