[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#703209: linux: Please Add multiplatform flavour to armhf



On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 03:46 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> [...]

> > > In future all ARM kernels should be multi-platform, but I expect there
> > > will still be different flavours, such as for LPAE or the RT featureset.
> > > I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction
> > > in future (and not be too long!).  Perhaps it should refer to the CPU
> > > requirement like the flavours for some other architectures.
> > 
> > I see. Although it is very simple, how is "armmp"?
> [...]
> 
> Sounds alright to be, but let's allow the other ARM porters a few more
> days to comment.

'MP' has some history as meaning multi-processor, so might be confusing.
(But perhaps not confusing to many.)

-- 
Tixy


Reply to: