On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:37 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 14:31:11 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 00:24 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 12:04 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 00:45:39 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > > > > Most of the changes are under: > > > > > debian/patches/features/all/alx/ > > > > > debian/patches/features/all/drm/ > > > > > debian/patches/features/all/fermi-accel/ [deleted] > > > > > debian/patches/features/all/iguanair/ > > > > > debian/patches/features/all/line6/ > > > > > debian/patches/features/all/virtio_scsi/ > > > > > for which the diffstat is: > > > > > 153 files changed, 167984 insertions(+), 873 deletions(-) > > > > > This is all new hardware support (with some risk of regressions in > > > > > the drm drivers, but feedback so far is overwhelmingly positive). > > > > > > > > > I've seen one possible regression report so far, #701743. > > > > > > Yes, I'm aware of that and will follow it up. > > > > Are you waiting for that to be resolved before unblocking? > > > Mostly I'm pondering d-i, because I'm not sure what effect migrating > linux will have on the rc1 netboot images. efivars from 3.2.39-2 will fail to load against the kernel from 3.2.35-2. That basically breaks installation on UEFI from amd64 netboot. The ipv6 module (where it *is* a module, which is only some armel flavours) will also fail to load. I'm unclear on whether it's possible to let debs migrate without udebs, but if you could do that it would probably be best for now. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part