[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#654438: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx is missing)



Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:46:03 +0200
with message-id <20130816154603.GB7012@pisco.westfalen.local>
and subject line Re: manual fix
has caused the Debian Bug report #654438,
regarding linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx is missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
654438: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx
Version: 2.6.39-3~bpo60+1
Severity: grave
Tags: squeeze
Justification: renders package unusable

Note: this is the kernel image for ixp4xx in the squeeze-backports repository

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: armel (armv5tel)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-kirkwood
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Frank wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:00:35 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
> wrote:
> > reassign 654438 src:linux
> > thanks
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Frank wrote:
> >> After running
> >>  apt-get install linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx
> >> 
> >> the reported problem occurs (missing initramfs). Manually creating it
> >> fixes the problem:
> >>  update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx
> >>  flash-kernel
> > 
> > Does this still occur with a standard Wheezy kernel or later?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >         Moritz
> 
> I haven't seen said problem with the current standard Wheezy kernel.

Closing the bug, then.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---

Reply to: