[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: uswsusp patches for initramfs-tools (was: Bug#632627: Re[2]: resume file)



On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 13:41 +0000, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote:
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escribió:
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 14:22 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Reconfiguring uswsusp should definitely not affect the behaviour of
> >> swsusp; that would be very surprising.  I think the configuration should
> >> be transferred the other way: uswsusp should copy the resume device and
> >> offset from initramfs-tools configuration (if initramfs-tools is
> >> installed).
> >
> > Note, I'm only suggesting that this should be done at installation time.
> > I think it would be confusing to simply make either of the current
> > configuration files override the other.
> >
> > I do think it would be preferable to switch to a single configuration
> > file for resume device and offset (or none, if automatic selection can
> > work) but we would need a transition plan that minimises confusion and
> > breakage.
> 
> Yes, the best option is have only one configuration file.
> The user must select the resume device (if there are more than one).
> What package should modify that file?

Perhaps linux-base?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit.  It's the only way to be sure.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: