Bug#700884: linux: please use a three-number version for experimental kernel packages
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:15:11PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...]
> That's using a kernel three releases newer than the userland. We
> generally like backward compatibility, but I don't it's tenable to go
> that far.
I quite agree. We've kept the fake '.0' for wheezy to keep old
userland working but at the risk of confusing users ('why aren't you
including stable updates?'). I don't want to carry on with that
workaround.
(Actually, I would like to fix things so that bumping the kernel
version string is not such a pain during a stable release. So a
real third version component might be added at some point.)
> Does the uname26 program from
> http://mirror.linux.org.au/linux/kernel/people/ak/uname26/ help?
Recent versions of setarch can do the same; debootstrap could try to
use that when necessary.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
Reply to: