Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:45:21 +0000 with message-id <1360208721.5374.31.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: linux-2.6: Please backport seccomp-filter to wheezy has caused the Debian Bug report #675615, regarding linux-2.6: Please backport seccomp-filter to wheezy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 675615: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675615 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: linux-2.6: Please backport seccomp-filter to wheezy
- From: Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:23:43 +0200
- Message-id: <20120602142343.5940.79513.reportbug@k.lan>
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist The seccomp filter code has this Linus' tree a while back and will be in 3.5. It's a very usefult security feature that would be very nice to have in wheezy. Is it possible to backport it or do you consider it to be too intrusive?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 675615-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: linux-2.6: Please backport seccomp-filter to wheezy
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:45:21 +0000
- Message-id: <1360208721.5374.31.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Sorry, this could not be resolved in time for release. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---