[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#684223: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.32: Two console fonts show broken bar instead of a vertical line)

Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:44:05 +0000
with message-id <1360205045.5374.9.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: linux-source-2.6.32: Two console fonts show broken bar instead of a vertical line
has caused the Debian Bug report #684223,
regarding linux-source-2.6.32: Two console fonts show broken bar instead of a vertical line
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
684223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
X-Mailer: reportbug 4.12.6
Package: linux-source-2.6.32
Version: 2.6.32-45
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

  The files "font_mini_4x6.c" and "font_sun8x16.c" in the
directory "drivers/video/console" define glyph "|" (124, 0x7C)
with a hole in the vertical line.

  Version 3.5 has the same holes.

  Patches:

--- font_mini_4x6.c	2009-12-03 03:51:21.000000000 +0000
+++ font_mini_4x6.c.new	2012-08-07 21:51:59.000000000 +0000
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@
 	/*{*/ 	/*   Char 124: '|' */
 	0x44,	/*=   [ *  ]        */
 	0x44,	/*=   [ *  ]        */
-	0x00,	/*=   [    ]        */
+	0x44,	/*=   [ *  ]        */
 	0x44,	/*=   [ *  ]        */
 	0x44,	/*=   [ *  ]        */
 	0x00,	/*=   [    ]        */


--- font_sun8x16.c	2009-12-03 03:51:21.000000000 +0000
+++ font_sun8x16.c.new	2012-08-07 21:53:51.000000000 +0000
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
 /*y*/ 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xc6,0xc6,0xc6,0xc6,0xc6,0xc6,0x7e,0x06,0x0c,0xf8,0x00,
 /*z*/ 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xfe,0xcc,0x18,0x30,0x60,0xc6,0xfe,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
 /*{*/ 0x00,0x00,0x0e,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x70,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x0e,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
-/*|*/ 0x00,0x00,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x00,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
+/*|*/ 0x00,0x00,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
 /*}*/ 0x00,0x00,0x70,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x0e,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x18,0x70,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
 /*~*/ 0x00,0x00,0x76,0xdc,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
 /* */ 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x10,0x38,0x6c,0xc6,0xc6,0xc6,0xfe,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-45
Locale: LANG=is_IS, LC_CTYPE=is_IS (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.32 depends on:
ii  binutils                2.20.1-16        The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2                   1.0.5-6+squeeze1 high-quality block-sorting file co

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.32 recommends:
ii  gcc                           4:4.4.5-1  The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]          2.11.3-4   Embedded GNU C Library: Developmen
ii  make                          3.81-8     An utility for Directing compilati

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.32 suggests:
pn  kernel-package            <none>         (no description available)
ii  libncurses5-dev [ncurses- 5.7+20100313-5 developer's libraries and docs for
pn  libqt3-mt-dev             <none>         (no description available)

-- no debconf information

-- 
Bjarni I. Gislason

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3.7.1-1~experimental.1

This was fixed upstream in 3.7.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: