On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 22:28:56 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > New image is up at > http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-amd64_3.2.34-1~jcristau.1_amd64.deb > > sha1sum is 1bbb6e4590e4f000739af89f3090ffc6bb9cb409. > diff against svn at > http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/3.2.34-1~jcristau.1.diff > New image: - rebased on 3.2.35-2 - updated drm to 3.4.24 - with additional patches from 3.2.y that were missing in 3.4.y diff at http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/drm-backport-3.2.35-3~jcristau.1.patch http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-686-pae_3.2.35-3~jcristau.1_i386.deb sha1sum 17980ee5bafc40bb4e7bf42576ce40ac81c75833 Lightly tested on Dell latitude D520 with intel 945gm graphics, and squeeze userspace. http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-amd64_3.2.35-3~jcristau.1_amd64.deb sha1sum f6711fe6d0d924aab82ec82fe1a86102a69a8c32 Running on Dell latitude E4200 with intel gm45 graphics, wheezy GNOME3 desktop. Ben, do you have ideas for getting some wider testing of these kernels? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature