[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#665881: [wheezy] module ath5k is blocking wlan-card



Hi Jonathan,
> 
> Could you send the command you used?  Generally you need to install
> the new Debian package you built and reboot to test, but there are
> other possibilities, too.  The above doesn't tell me enough to know
> what went wrong.

Sure! I did the following: Installed all needed packages, unpacked the source 
package and made a symlink /usr/src/linux to /usr/src/linux-source-3.2

Patched: patch -p1 < /mypath/blah/0001ath5kxxxxxxxxxx.patch
So I did with all patches.

Then copied /boot/config-3.2.0-4-amd64 to /usr/src/linux/.config (so I got also 
the version, worked before in the past this way).

After that make menuconfig to check.

Building then:  make modules, because I just wanted to build only the ath5k 
module. 

At last I copied the newly build module ath5k.ko and replaced it with the new 
built one.

depmod -a finished all.

> 
> You've made this same argument before.  The sad situation we're in is
> that only a small fraction of Debian users report bugs.  You're a
> representative of quiet masses of Debian users, potential Debian
> users, and other Linux users with similar hardware.  Meanwhile
> stubborn people like me want to see all easily-fixable hardware
> support bugs fixed, even if they only affect one person.
> 

Well, if there are other people with the same problem, leave it open. Very ok 
for me! I just did not want to waste your time for a single person (=me), who 
cannot give much help back.

> Sorry for the burden, but it really does help.
> 
> Of course if you're sick of it, that's also fine --- we can mark the
> bug as unreproducible, stop bothering you, and probably close it in a
> couple of weeks.

No, I am not sick and I will try it in the next time. But my time is limited, 
as I cannot run compilatiuon at work and in the evening the time is often too 
short, to run a compilation.

> 
> Hoping that clarifies,
> Jonathan

Best regards

Hans


Reply to: