Bug#684927: marked as done (linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB)
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:58:28 +0100
with message-id <20120814205828.GW1894@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#684927: linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB
has caused the Debian Bug report #684927,
regarding linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
684927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684927
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
Why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB.
The former seems to be better and even the help text says it's the
default choice.
Cheers,
Chris.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Source: linux
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi.
>
> Why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB.
> The former seems to be better and even the help text says it's the
> default choice.
RTFchangelog
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--- End Message ---
Reply to: