Processed: Re: Bug#684666: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"

To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#684666: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:06:04 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.B684666.134480177725610.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 1344801762.824.64.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 17027863.2278411344789917237.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>

Processing control commands:

> retitle -1 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault in find_get_pages
Bug #684666 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault in find_get_pages' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"'

-- 
684666: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#684666: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Bug#684666: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"
  - From: "asronchetti@libero.it" <asronchetti@libero.it>

Prev by Date: Bug#684666: same hardware as in #683807
Next by Date: Bug#684666: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"
Previous by thread: Bug#684666: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"
Next by thread: Bug#684666: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP "Xorg Not Tainted"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread