Bug#676360: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] thp: avoid atomic64_read in pmd_read_atomic for 32bit PAE\
- To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
- Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Petr Matousek <pmatouse@redhat.com>, 676360@bugs.debian.org, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
- Subject: Bug#676360: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] thp: avoid atomic64_read in pmd_read_atomic for 32bit PAE\
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:41:16 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120611194113.GH3094@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, 676360@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120611192738.GM14535@phenom.dumpdata.com>
- References: <[🔎] 20120610020331.GA26100@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 4728e392-7130-4967-aa79-8da12f929191@zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <[🔎] 20120611192738.GM14535@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 03:27:38PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Nice. Andrew, any chane you could test this patch on the affected
> > > Xen hypervisors? Was it as easy to reproduce this on a RHEL5 (U1?)
> > > hypervisor or is it really only on Linode and Amazon EC2?
> > >
> >
> > Originally, I was able to reproduce the issue easily with a RHEL5
> > host. Now, with this patch it's fixed.
>
> OK, so Tested-by: Andrew Jones..
> and from my perspective it looks good - so Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Thanks for testing and reviews.
> Andrea, any chance you can respin this patch and send it to Linus for 3.5 please?
Andrew merged it in -mm last Friday, so I would expect it to go
upstream soon through the -mm flow (I assume everyone has been
rightfully waiting a bit of time for testing and reviews to be sure).
Andrea
Reply to: