On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 15:12 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 21:21 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:44:31PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:13 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > [...] > > > > Given the number of bugs involved, perhaps we > > > > need to teach debbugs that "linux-2.6" should be considered as an alias > > > > for "linux" for the purposes of queries and of input to submit@ and > > > > control@. > > > > > > > > Ben, do you have any constraints on the timeline for this that we should > > > > know about? > > > > > > No rush. > > > > But it would be kind of nice to be able to rename the package before > > the wheezy freeze. > > > > > > Don, what do you think about all this? I think it's tractable, but it > > > > feels like a pretty solid weekend's work to me. > > > > Has any work been done on this, or are any BTS changes actually > > necessary? > > Ping! OK, ignore this. The BTS version tracking seems to be sufficient and we will go ahead with renaming. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Knowledge is power. France is bacon.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part